He had fundamentally different, but wholly consistent, ideas about musical interpretation, recording technology, presentation of music to audiences, and so on. However, what set Gould apart from his colleagues was his innovative and iconoclastic interpretations of well-known works with “standard” prescriptions. These qualities are analogous to “being smart”. Go to any university or observe any competition and you’ll plainly see awesome talent. But lots of incredible pianists have these abilities. He had awesome technical ability at the piano, and a fantastic memory. As an example, Glenn Gould was a classical pianist and renowned Bach interpreter. I feel pg’s point is similar to musicians.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |